4.7 Article

Reprogramming efficiency following somatic cell nuclear transfer is influenced by the differentiation and methylation state of the donor nucleus

Journal

STEM CELLS
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages 2007-2013

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0050

Keywords

embryonic stem cells; DNA methylation; nuclear transfer; reprogramming

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [G9806702, G0800784, G0300058] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCI NIH HHS [R37 CA084198, R37 CA84198-04] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NICHD NIH HHS [R01 HD045022] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINDS NIH HHS [K08 NS048118, K08 NS048118-01A1, K08 NS48118] Funding Source: Medline
  5. MRC [G0300058, G9806702] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Medical Research Council [G0300058, G9806702] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reprogramming of a differentiated cell nucleus by somatic cell nuclear transplantation is an inefficient process. Following nuclear transfer, the donor nucleus often fails to express early embryonic genes and establish a normal embryonic pattern of chromatin modifications. These defects correlate with the low number of cloned embryos able to produce embryonic stem cells or develop into adult animals. Here, we show that the differentiation and methylation state of the donor cell influence the efficiency of genomic reprogramming. First, neural stem cells, when used as donors for nuclear transplantation, produce embryonic stem cells at a higher efficiency than blastocysts derived from terminally differentiated neuronal donor cells, demonstrating a correlation between the state of differentiation and cloning efficiency. Second, using a hypomorphic allele of DNA methyltransferase-1, we found that global hypomethylation of a differentiated cell genome improved cloning efficiency. Our results provide functional evidence that the differentiation and epigenetic state of the donor nucleus influences reprogramming efficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available