4.4 Article

The enhancement of HCN channel instantaneous current facilitated by slow deactivation is regulated by intracellular chloride concentration

Journal

PFLUGERS ARCHIV-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 452, Issue 6, Pages 718-727

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00424-006-0095-0

Keywords

HCN channel; intracellular chloride; instantaneous current

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The hyperpolarization-activated cation current if plays a key role in the modulation of rhythmic activity in cardiac pacemaker cells and spontaneously firing neurons. I(f) is generated by hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels (HCN1-HCN4) and comprises two components: the fast instantaneous current (I(INS)) and the slowly developing steady-state current (I(SS)). We found that in If traces evoked by consecutive hyperpolarization, the I(INS) amplitude of the second trace was up to 50% larger than the first. I(SS) was identical. This pre-hyperpolarization mediated enhancement of I(INS) was maximal in channels displaying slow kinetics (sinoatrial I(f), HCN3, and HCN4), while it was almost negligible for fast channels (HCN1 and HCN2). The enhancement quantitatively correlated with the frequency of hyperpolarization. Analysis of HCN4 currents suggested that enhancement was facilitated by incomplete deactivation, confirmed by HCN2-HCN4 chimeric studies. It is important to note that intracellular Cl(-) was found to be a cellular suppressor of I(INS) enhancement. Cl(-) inhibited the enhancement with an IC(50) around 25 mM and Hill coefficients between 2 and 6 Cl(-) shifted V(0.5) by +7 mV when [Cl(-)]i was increased from 11 to 141 mM. In conclusion, IINS represents a quantitatively important component of If at low Cl(-) (as found in most cell types). Moreover, an increase in cellular Cl(-) will suppress enhancement of I(INS) and, hence, potentially affect the electrical properties of cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available