4.3 Article

Phase II trial of adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer

Journal

CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages 150-154

Publisher

CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP
DOI: 10.3816/CGC.2006.n.032

Keywords

adjuvant chemotherapy; p53; pRB; p16

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Despite the general acceptance of gemcitabine/cisplatin in metastatic bladder cancer, its role and tolerability in the adjuvant setting, in A which renal insufficiency is common, is unclear. Patients and Methods: total of 39 patients with locally advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder (T2-T4, N0-N2) were treated with 4 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin/amifostine after radical cystectomy. All toxicities were evaluated by the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. Tumor samples were immunohistochemically stained for pRB, p53, and p16. Results: Thirty-five patients (90%) completed 4 cycles of chemotherapy Eleven patients (28%) experienced grade 4 hematologic toxicity, and 14 patients (36%) experienced grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity. The median increase in creatinine was 0.3 mg/dL. With a median follow-up of 22.8 months (range, 7-70 months), 13 patients (33%) had recurrent disease, 1 patient at 6 years after completion of therapy. Twelve patients (31%) died, including 11 (28%) with recurrent disease. Thirty-three tumor blocks were evaluated for pRB, p53, and p16 alterations. In an exploratory analysis, altered expression of p53, p16, and pRB was found in 15 (45%), 22 (67%), and 30 patients (91%), respectively. No association between altered p53 and disease-free or overall survival was detected, but altered p16 and pRB expression was associated with better outcome (P <= 0.001). Conclusion: Gemcitabine/cisplatin with amifostine is tolerated in the adjuvant setting for patients with locally advanced bladder cancer. The favorable prognostic value of altered p16 and pRB raises the hypothesis of a relative beneficial effect of chemotherapy in this population but needs verification in other studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available