4.0 Article

Suppression, release and canopy recruitment in five tree species from a seasonal tropical forest in western Thailand

Journal

JOURNAL OF TROPICAL ECOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue -, Pages 521-529

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0266467406003312

Keywords

canopy trees; Chukrasia tabularis; gap dynamics; Melia azederach; Neolitsea obtusifolia; seasonal tropical forest; suppression; Thailand; Toona ciliata; tree-rings; Vitex peduncularis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We used tree-rings to reconstruct long-term patterns of suppression, release and growth among five sympatric canopy tree species representing the full range of shade tolerance in a seasonal tropical forest in western Thailand. We expected that the frequency and duration of suppression and release events would be positively correlated with shade tolerance. All five species showed evidence of major and moderate growth releases. As expected, Melia azederach. an extreme heliophile. had the fewest releases. However, among the other species the number of major releases was consistent across the range of shade tolerance. The most significant difference among the species was the number of moderate releases recorded. There was a general positive correlation between the number of moderate releases and shade tolerance: however, Chukrasia tabularis. a relatively shade-intolerant species, had an anomalously high number of moderate releases. The study species also showed considerable variation in canopy accession strategies. The least common canopy accession strategy was establishment in the understorey and growth into the canopy in the absence of any gaps. However. with the exception of Melia, all four study species had one or more individuals that successfully reached the canopy using each of the four canopy accession strategies. These results highlight the importance of periodic or episodic bouts of gap formation on canopy tree recruitment and the utility of tree-rings for reconstructing long-term growth patterns in tropical trees.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available