4.0 Article

Frequency-dependent reciprocal modulation of verbal fluency and motor functions in subthalamic deep brain stimulation

Journal

ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 63, Issue 9, Pages 1273-1276

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archneur.63.9.1273

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: High-frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) improves motor functions in those with Parkinson disease but may worsen frontal functions such as verbal fluency (VF). In contrast, low-frequency DBS leads to deterioration of motor functions. It is not known whether low-frequency STN DBS also has an effect on frontal functions. Objective: To examine whether low-frequency STN DBS in contrast to high-frequency STN DBS has a positive effect on frontal functions on the basis of VF test results. Design: A double-blind randomized crossover experiment to compare performance in 4 VF subtests and motor performance at 10 Hz, 130 Hz, and no stimulation. Setting: University hospitals in Dusseldorf and Cologne, Germany. Patients: Twelve patients with Parkinson disease 3 months or more after bilateral electrode implantation into the STN. Main Outcome Measure: Mean number of words in VF at different stimulation frequencies. Results: The VF was significantly better at 10 Hz (48.3 words) compared with 130 Hz and showed a nonsignificant trend toward worsening at 130 Hz (42.3 words) compared with no stimulation (43.8 words). These results were consistent across all subtests. Conclusions: The study provides evidence of a beneficial effect of low-frequency (10 Hz) STN DBS on VF, which may be caused by activating neural pathways projecting to the frontal cortex. In addition, the study reproduces the negative effect of therapeutic high-frequency STN DBS on VF. The study results provide evidence for a frequency-dependent modulation of cognitive circuits involving the STN.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available