4.5 Article

Ubiquitylation-independent ER-associated degradation of an AE1 mutant associated with dominant hereditary spherocytosis in cattle

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
Volume 119, Issue 17, Pages 3602-3612

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.03101

Keywords

ER-associated degradation (ERAD); proteasome; ubiquitylation; AE1; dominant negative; hereditary spherocytosis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Various mutations in the AE1 (anion exchanger 1, band 3) gene cause dominant hereditary spherocytosis, a common congenital hemolytic anemia associated with deficiencies of AE1 of different degrees and loss of mutant protein from red blood cell membranes. To determine the mechanisms underlying decreases in AE1 protein levels, we employed K562 and HEK293 cell lines and Xenopus oocytes together with bovine wild-type AE1 and an R664X nonsense mutant responsible for dominant hereditary spherocytosis to analyze protein expression, turnover, and intracellular localization. R664X-mutant protein underwent rapid degradation and caused specifically increased turnover and impaired trafficking to the plasma membrane of the wildtype protein through hetero-oligomer formation in K562 cells. Consistent with those observations, co-expression of mutant and wild-type AE1 reduced anion transport by the wild- type protein in oocytes. Transfection studies in K562 and HEK293 cells revealed that the major pathway mediating degradation of both R664X and wild-type AE1 employed endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-associated degradation through the proteasomal pathway. Proteasomal degradation of R664X protein appeared to be independent of both ubiquitylation and N-glycosylation, and aggresome formation was not observed following proteasome inhibition. These findings indicate that AE1 R664X protein, which is associated with dominant hereditary spherocytosis, has a dominant-negative effect on the expression of wild- type AE1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available