4.6 Article

β1-adrenergic receptor antagonism abrogates cardioprotective effects of intermittent hypoxia

Journal

BASIC RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY
Volume 101, Issue 5, Pages 436-446

Publisher

DR DIETRICH STEINKOPFF VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s00395-006-0599-y

Keywords

cardioprotection; hypoxia; infarction; metoprolol; ventricular fibrillation; ventricular tachycardia

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL 071684] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Adaptation to hypoxia lessens myocardial ischemic injury. This study tested whether hypoxia-induced beta-adrenergic activity mobilizes mechanisms that protect myocardium during subsequent ischemia and reperfusion. Dogs were intermittent hypoxia conditioned (IHC) by a 20 days program of 5-8 daily, 5-10 min cycles of normobaric hypoxia (FIO2=9.5-10%), or sham conditioned with normoxic air, and metoprolol (beta(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist) was administered throughout the IHC program. Twenty-four hours after the last IHC session, the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) was occluded for 60 min, and then reperfused for 5 h. Area at risk (AAR) and infarct size (IS) were measured. IHC lowered IS/AAR from 38 +/- 6% in sham-conditioned dogs to 1.1 +/- 0.3%, and eliminated ventricular tachycardia (VT) and fibrillation (VF) that occurred in 14 of 17 non-conditioned dogs. Metoprolol blunted IHC-evoked cardioprotection (IS/AAR=27 +/- 3%), and VT and/or VF occurred in 5 of 6 dogs. Metoprolol did not exacerbate ischemic injury in sham-conditioned dogs (IS/AAR=38 +/- 2%). Neither IHC nor metoprolol affected hematocrit or LAD collateral blood flow. A single IHC session failed to protect ischemic myocardium (IS/AAR = 36 +/- 8%), and protection was incomplete after 10 days of IHC (IS/AAR = 13 +/- 5%), suggesting that de novo protein synthesis was required for protection. Thus, episodic beta(1)-adrenergic activation during IHC evokes progressive development of powerful resistance to myocardial ischemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available