4.6 Article

Pathway-specific apoptotic gene expression profiling in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and follicular lymphoma

Journal

MODERN PATHOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages 1192-1202

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800632

Keywords

apoptosis; oligonucleotide microarray; chronic lymphocytic leukemia; follicular lymphoma; treatment

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Defects in the apoptotic pathway are pathogenetically important in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and follicular lymphoma. To further understand these defects, we profiled the apoptotic gene expression of these two neoplasms. Oligonucleotide arrays with 112 apoptotic genes were used, and data analysis was performed on seven chronic lymphocytic leukemia and 10 follicular lymphoma frozen tumor samples from six and seven patients, respectively. The overall gene expression pattern was strikingly similar among all 17 samples, regardless of the type of lymphoma and history of chemotherapy exposure. MCL1, TNFRSF1B and TNFRSF7 were highly expressed in most cases. The apoptotic gene expression between the groups of untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n=3) and untreated follicular lymphoma (n=6) was also similar (Pearson correlation coefficient, 0.94). Comparison between the groups of untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n=3) and postchemotherapy chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n=4) revealed six genes with > 2-fold changes, including BIRC5/Survivin that was higher in the postchemotherapy samples. This finding was validated by immunohistochemistry. Similar analysis of follicular lymphoma cases did not identify any significant differences. To conclude, our findings suggest that chronic lymphocytic leukemia and follicular lymphoma share common apoptotic defects, and highlight the importance of MCL1 and the TNF pathway. Upregulation of survivin may be one of the mechanisms by which chronic lymphocytic leukemia becomes desensitized to chemotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available