4.7 Article

TLR4 polymorphism in Iranian patients with brucellosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTION
Volume 53, Issue 3, Pages 206-210

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2005.10.018

Keywords

TLR4; polymorphism; brucellosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Brucellosis is a zoonosis of both public health and economic significance in most developing countries. Polymorphisms in Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR4) have been reported to be associated with a blunted immune response to microbial pathogens. Information regarding any association between genetic variation of TLR4 and susceptibility to brucellosis is not available in the literatures. The main purpose of this research is to evaluate the role of polymorphic alleles of TLR4 gene in susceptibility to brucellosis. Materials and methods: In this case-control study, 198 patients with brucellosis and 111 healthy volunteers matched for sex, age and geographic area were evaluated by genotyping for polymorphism in TLR4 gene (Asp299Gly) using amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS)-PCR method. Results: Allele 896G was more prevalent in patients with brucellosis compared to healthy controls (33.6% vs. 20.7%, P = 0.000003). Also the frequency of G allele of TLR4 gene was significantly higher in mate patients with brucellosis compared to the same sex in control group (36% vs. 21.7%, P = 0.00005). Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that mate patients heterozygous at allele G gene had a significantly higher risk for brucellosis with an odds ratio of OR 2.89, 95% CI: 1.79-4.69, P < 0.0001). Conclusion: This study is the first to show an association between genetic polymorphism in TLR4 gene and susceptibility to brucellosis. (C) 2005 The British Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available