4.5 Article

Advance care planning documents in nursing facilities: Results from a nationally representative survey

Journal

ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages 193-212

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2005.10.007

Keywords

advance directives; advance care planning; death and dying; end-of-life care; do-not-resuscitate orders; living wills

Funding

  1. AHRQ HHS [T32 HS000046] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed clinical, demographic, facility, and regional factors associated with documented do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders, feeding/medication/other treatment (FMT) restrictions, and living wills among nursing facility residents. Using the Nursing Home Component of the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, a nationally representative sample of 815 facilities and 5899 residents, three separate multivariate logistic regression models were developed. DNR orders were more prevalent among residents aged 75+ and those with severe cognitive impairment, dementia, emphysema, and cancer, but less common among African Americans and Latinos than whites. Residents with living children were more likely to have DNR orders. Latinos were less likely to have FMT restrictions. Living wills were more common among residents aged 75+ and those with psychiatric/mood disorders and heart disease, but less prevalent among African Americans. Residents with less social engagement and household incomes below 400% of the Federal Poverty Level were less likely to have a living will. Residents with Medicaid as their largest payer were less likely to have an advance care plan than those with Medicare or other payment mechanisms. To increase the use of advance care plans, interventions should focus on groups with less social engagement and lower household income. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available