4.7 Article

Spitzer observations of acetylene bands in carbon-rich asymptotic giant branch stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 371, Issue 1, Pages 415-420

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10664.x

Keywords

stars : AGB and post-AGB; stars : atmospheres; stars : carbon; stars : mass-loss; Magellanic Clouds

Funding

  1. STFC [PP/D000955/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/D000955/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate the molecular bands in carbon-rich asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC), using the Infrared Spectrograph (IRS) onboard the Spitzer Space Telescope (SST) over the 5-38 mu m range. All 26 low-resolution spectra show acetylene (C2H2) bands at 7 and 14 mu m. The hydrogen cyanide (HCN) bands at these wavelengths are very weak or absent. This is consistent with low nitrogen abundances in the LMC. The observed 14 mu m C2H2 band is reasonably reproduced by an excitation temperature of 500 K. There is no clear dilution of the 14 mu m C2H2 band by circumstellar dust emission. This 14-mu m band originates from molecular gas in the circumstellar envelope in these high mass-loss rate stars, in agreement with previous findings for Galactic stars. The C2H2 column density, derived from the 13.7 mu m band, shows a gas mass-loss rate in the range 3 x 10(-6) to 5 x 10(-5) M-circle dot yr(-1). This is comparable with the total mass-loss rate of these stars estimated from the spectral energy distribution. Additionally, we compare the line strengths of the 13.7 mu m C2H2 band of our LMC sample with those of a Galactic sample. Despite the low metallicity of the LMC, there is no clear difference in the C2H2 abundance among LMC and Galactic stars. This reflects the effect of the third dredge-up bringing self-produced carbon to the surface, leading to high carbon-to-oxygen ratio at low metallicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available