4.7 Article

Daphnia fatty acid composition reflects that of their diet

Journal

LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY
Volume 51, Issue 5, Pages 2428-2437

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2006.51.5.2428

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We conducted a series of experiments feeding Daphnia pulex nine different phytoplankton monocultures with widely varying fatty acid composition and nutritional values to test the extent to which Daphnia fatty acid composition was affected by diet. In general, Daphnia fatty acid composition matched that of their diet much more closely than it did the fatty acid composition of Daphnia consuming other diets. However, Daphnia had consistently less saturated fatty acids and more arachidonic acid than did their diet, and Daphnia consuming cyanobacteria had substantially less saturated fatty acids and more monounsaturated fatty acids than their diets. Daphnia that consumed cryptophytes, which are rich in omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), had on average 47% +/- 8% (+/- 1 SD) omega 3 PUFAs within their fatty acid pool, whereas Daphnia that consumed omega 3 PUFA-poor cyanophytes only had 6% +/- 3% omega 3 PUFAs. The ratio of omega 3 to omega 6 fatty acids in Daphnia was also strongly dependent on diet, and averaged approximate to 10 : 1, 2 : 1, and 1 : 1 for Daphnia that consumed cryptophytes, chlorophytes, and cyanophytes, respectively. Furthermore, the sum of C-20 and C-22 omega 3 and omega 6 fatty acids in Daphnia was highly correlated with that of their diet (r(2) = 0.94). These results suggest analyses of Daphnia fatty acid composition may be a powerful means of inferring diet in the field. These results also suggest the nutritional benefits of consuming omega 3-rich phytoplankton will transfer up the food web, making zooplankton both more efficient at converting phytoplankton biomass to their own biomass as well as much more nutritious for the zooplanktivorous fish that consume them.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available