4.8 Article

Gene expression profile of quiescent and activated rat hepatic stellate-cells implicates Wnt signaling pathway in activation

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages 401-409

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.03.016

Keywords

liver fibrosis; hepatic stellate cells; DNA microarray; gene expression

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [1R01DK59466-01A1] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: Liver fibrosis is characterized by accumulation of extracellular matrix proteins synthesized by activated hepatic stellate cells (HSCs). To understand molecular mechanisms of HSCs activation a comprehensive comparison of gene expression between quiescent and activated HSCs is needed. Methods: Using DNA microarrays we compared expression of 31,100 genes between quiescent rat HSCs and culture activated rat HSCs. Expression of the components of Wnt signaling was analyzed in HSCs and fibrotic livers by RTPCR. Activation of P-catenin was analyzed by Western blot. Results: Nine hundred genes were upregulated more than 4.6-fold and 500 genes were downregulated more than 5.7-fold in activated HSCs. The upregulated genes included Wnt receptor frizzled 2, ligands Wnt4 and Wnt5, which was confirmed in fibrotic livers. Expression of the target genes of Wnt signaling was increased from 5- to 70-fold. Phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of P-catenin were unchanged, indicating activation of the noncanonical Wnt pathway. Conclusions: Highly upregulated expression of Wnt5a and its receptor frizzled 2 implicates this pathway in differentiation of quiescent HSCs into myofibroblasts. Activation of Wnt signaling pathway in HSCs and in animal models of liver fibrosis has not been described previously, suggesting an important role of Wnt signaling in development of liver fibrosis. (c) 2006 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published,by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available