4.4 Article

Analysis of LFP phase predicts sensory response of barrel cortex

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages 1658-1663

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.01288.2005

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIBIB NIH HHS [R01 EB-00790] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [R01 DA-015644] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH-59733] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINDS NIH HHS [NS-051188] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several previous studies have shown the existence of Up and Down states and have linked their magnitude ( e. g., depolarization level) to the size of sensory-evoked responses. Here, we studied how the temporal dynamics of such states influence the sensory-evoked response to vibrissa deflection. Under alpha-chloralose anesthesia, barrel cortex exhibits strong quasi-periodic similar to 1-Hz local field potential ( LFP) oscillations generated by the synchronized fluctuation of large populations of neurons between depolarized ( Up) and hyperpolarized ( Down) states. Using a linear depth electrode array, we recorded the LFP and multiunit activity ( MUA) simultaneously across multiple layers of the barrel column and used the LFP to approximate the subthreshold Up-Down fluctuations. Our central finding is that the MUA response is a strong function of the LFP oscillation's phase. When only ongoing LFP magnitude was considered, the response was largest in the Down state, in agreement with previous studies. However, consideration of the LFP phase revealed that the MUA response varied smoothly as a function of LFP phase in a manner that was not monotonically dependent on LFP magnitude. The LFP phase is therefore a better predictor of the MUA response than the LFP magnitude is. Our results suggest that, in the presence of ongoing oscillations, there can be a continuum of response properties and that each phase may, at times, need to be considered a distinct cortical state.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available