4.5 Article

Brain arterioles show more active vesicular transport of blood-borne tracer molecules than capillaries and venules after focused ultrasound-evoked opening of the blood-brain barrier

Journal

ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 9, Pages 1399-1409

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.05.015

Keywords

blood-brain barrier; ultrasound; arterioles; transendothelial vesicular traffic; ultrastructural morphometry

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [U41RR019703] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIBIB NIH HHS [EB 003268, EB 000705] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previously, activation of vesicular transport in the brain microvasculature was shown to be one of the mechanisms of focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier (BBB) opening. In the present study, we aimed to estimate the rate of the transendothelial vesicular traffic after focused ultrasound sonication in the rabbit brain, using ultrastructural morphometry and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) as a tracer. In the capillaries, the mean endothelial pinocytotic densities (the number of HRP-containing vesicles per mu m(2) of the cell cytoplasm) were 0.9 and 1.05 vesicles/mu m(2) 1 h after sonication with ultrasound frequencies of 0.69 and 0.26 MHz, respectively. In the arterioles, these densities were 1.63 and 2.43 vesicles/mu m(2), values 1.8 and 2.3 times higher. In control locations, the densities were 0.7 and 0.14 vesicles/mu m(2) for capillaries and arterioles, respectively. A small number of HRP-positive vesicles were observed in the venules. Focal delivery of HRP tracer was also observed in light microscopy. The results indicate that the precapillary microvessels play an important role in macromolecular transcytoplasmic traffic through the ultrasound-induced BBB modulation, which should be considered in the future development of trans-BBB drug delivery strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available