4.6 Article

Indirect effects of leptin receptor deficiency on lymphocyte populations and immune response in db/db mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 177, Issue 5, Pages 2899-2907

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.5.2899

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Leptin-deficient ob/ob and leptin receptor (Ob-rb)-deficient db/db mice display a marked thymic atrophy and exhibit defective immune responses. Lymphocytes express leptin receptors and leptin exerts direct effects on T cells in vitro. In addition, ob/ob and db/db mice display multiple neuroendocrine and metabolic defects, through which leptin deficiency may indirectly affect the immune system in vivo. To study the relative contributions of direct and indirect effects of leptin on the immune system in a normal environment, we generated bone marrow chimeras (BMCs) by transplantation of leptin receptor-deficient db/db, or control db/+, bone marrow cells into wild-type (WT) recipients. The size and cellularity of the thymus, as well as cellular and humoral immune responses, were similar in db/db to WT and db/+ to WT BMCs. The immune phenotype of db/db mice is thus not explained by a cell autonomous defect of db/db lymphocytes. Conversely, thymus weight and cell number were decreased in the reverse graft setting in WT to db/db BMCs, indicating that expression of the leptin receptor in the environment is important for T cell development. Finally, normal thymocyte development occurred in fetal db/db thymi transplanted into WT hosts, indicating that direct effects of leptin are not required locally in the thymic microenvironment. In conclusion, direct effects of leptin on bone marrow-derived cells and on thymic stromal cells are not necessary for T lymphocyte maturation in normal mice. In contrast, leptin receptor deficiency affects the immune system indirectly via changes in the systemic environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available