4.6 Article

Activation of ERK and suppression of calcineurin are interacting mechanisms of cardioprotection afforded by δ-opioid receptor activation

Journal

BASIC RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY
Volume 101, Issue 5, Pages 418-426

Publisher

DR DIETRICH STEINKOPFF VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s00395-006-0595-2

Keywords

delta-opioid receptor; ERK; calcineurin; FK506; infarct size

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to examine possible interactions of ERK and calcineurin in cardioprotection afforded by delta-opioid receptor stimulation. Infarction was induced in rat hearts by 20-min coronary occlusion and reperfusion. Tissue ERK level and calcienurin activity were determined by immunoblotting and an assay using a phosphopeptide substrate, respectively. Administration of a delta-opioid receptor agonist, D-Ala(2)-D-Leu(5)-enkephalin (DADLE, 1 mg/kg), before ischemia increased the phospho-ERK levels during ischemia and reduced infarct size (as percentage of risk area, %IS/AR) from 47.7 +/- 2.3% to 23.2 +/- 2.5%. This protection was abolished by 10 mg/kg of natrindole hydrochloride (NTI), a delta-opioid receptor antagonist. PD98059, a MEK1/2 inhibitor, abolished both ERK1/2 activation and infarct size limitation by DADLE. Calcineurin inhibitors, cyclosporine-A (5 mg/kg) and FK506 (3.5 mg/kg), reduced %IS/AR (27.4 +/- 4.4% and 29.9 +/- 3.4%, respectively). The protective effects of these calcineurin inhibitors were inhibited by PD98059, and the combination of DADLE with cyclosporine-A or FK506 did not afford further cardioprotection. DADLE significantly suppressed myocardial calcineurin activity, and this effect was inhibited by NTI. Suppression of calcineurin activity by FK506 was associated with modest activation of ERK1/2. These results suggest that suppression of calcineurin and activation of ERK1/2 are interacting mechanisms involved in cardioprotection by delta-opioid receptor activation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available