4.4 Article

Strategic memory in adults with anorexia nervosa: Are there similarities to obsessive compulsive spectrum disorders?

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 468-476

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eat.20300

Keywords

anorexia nervosa; obsessive-compulsive disorder; neuropsycological testing; memory; learning; Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test (RCFT); strategic planning; cognition; organization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: There is growing interest in the relationship between anorexia nervosa (AN) and obsessive-compulsive (OC) spectrum disorders (e.g., OCD, body clysmorphic disorder [EDD]). Previous neuropsychological investigations of OC spectrum disorders have identified problems with the efficient use of strategy on complex measures of learning and memory. This study evaluated nonverbal strategic memory in AN outpatients using an approach previously applied to OC spectrum disorders. Method: Eighteen patients with AN and 19 healthy control participants completed the Rey-Cisterrieth Complex Figure Test (RCFT), a widely used measure of nonverbal strategic planning, learning, and memory. Results: Individuals with AN differed significantly from healthy controls in the organizational strategies used to copy the RCFT figure, and they recalled significantly less information on both immediate and delayed testing. Multiple regression analyses indicated that group differences in learning were mediated by copy organizational strategies. Conclusion: These results are identical to study findings in OCD and BDD, indicating important shared neuropsychological features among AN and these OC spectrum disorders. As in OCD and 131313, the essential cognitive deficit in AN was impaired use of organizational strategies, which may inform our understanding of the pathophysiology of AN and potentially offer treatment implications. (c) 2006 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available