4.4 Article

Effects of group I metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonists on the behavioral sensitization to motor effects of cocaine in rats

Journal

PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 187, Issue 4, Pages 397-404

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-006-0440-1

Keywords

cocaine; motor activity; sensitization; conditioning; metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonist; rat

Funding

  1. FIC NIH HHS [R03TW00714] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) were reported to regulate various behavioral effects of addictive drugs. Objective The present study evaluated the role of group I mGluRs in the progressive augmentation (sensitization) of the behavioral effects observed after repeated, intermittent cocaine exposure. Materials and methods After habituation to handling and baseline activity measurement (days 1-2), rats received eight injections of cocaine (10 mg/kg) or saline on days 3-6, 8-11, and then, were tested twice with acute saline and cocaine given in a counterbalanced manner on days 13 and 15. Before the test sessions, subjects were pretreated with mGluR1 antagonist EMQMCM (JNJ16567083, (3-ethyl-2-methyl-quinolin-6-yl)-(4-methoxy-cyclohexyl)-methanone methanesulfonate) and mGluR5 antagonist MTEP ([(2-methyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl)ethynyl]pyridine). Results Pretreatment with EMQMCM (2.5-10 mg/kg) but not MTEP (2.5-10 mg/kg) significantly reduced expression of the sensitized ambulatory motor activity of the cocaine-experienced animals acutely challenged with cocaine. Both EMQMCM and MTEP significantly reduced vertical motor activity across all cocaine/saline treatment conditions. Conclusions These findings indicate that the expression of behavioral sensitization to cocaine-induced stimulation of locomotor activity may be modulated by group I mGluR antagonists (mGluR1 rather than mGluR5), but these effects occur at the dose levels that attenuate vertical activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available