4.3 Article

Implementation of the EGFP-K562 flow cytometric NK test: Determination of NK cytotoxic activity in healthy elderly volunteers before and after feeding

Journal

CYTOMETRY PART A
Volume 69A, Issue 9, Pages 992-998

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20301

Keywords

natural killer; flow cytometry; EGFP-K562; cytotoxic activity; elderly

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Natural Killer (NK) cells are key actors of innate immunity that supervise the organism's cells, and fight against viral infections and cancer development through their cytotoxic activity. This cytotoxic activity is modulated by cytokines and hormones and could be influenced by physiological or pathological conditions. New techniques for measuring NK cytotoxic activity by flow-cytometry have recently been developed, and they correlated strongly with the standard chromium (Cr-51) release assay. Our aim was to implement a previously published enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP)-K562 flow cytometric method and use it to evaluate NK cytotoxic activity under different nutritional conditions. Methods: NK effector cells were isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and a K562 cell line stably transfected by EGFP was used as target cells. Different analytical parameters, including cell ratios and incubation times, were studied to improve the EGFP-K562 flow cytometric NK test conditions. Results: The optimized test was then used to determine the effect of fasting and refeeding on NK cell numbers and activity in a physiological situation. NK cytotoxic activity in fasted conditions (30.4 +/- 4.4%) increased by a factor 1.7 +/- 0.2 (P = 0.0025) in nourished conditions (45.0 +/- 4.6%) in healthy elderly people. Conclusion: Therefore, this method provides a reliable, reproducible and rapid test for analyzing NK cytotoxicity under various conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available