3.8 Article

Functional analysis of gammaretroviral vector transduction by quantitative PCR

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENE MEDICINE
Volume 8, Issue 9, Pages 1097-1104

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jgm.951

Keywords

gammaretrovirus; quantitative PCR; titration; proviral copies; transgene expression; transcription index

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background In a clinical setting of gene therapy, quantitative methods are required to determine recombinant viral titres and transgene mRNA expression, avoiding the use of reporter genes. Methods We describe procedures based on quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) designed to assess functional titres of murine leukaemia virus (MLV) vectors, determine proviral copy numbers in transduced cells, and estimate retroviral transgene expression in both target cell lines and mice with transduced chimeric haernatopoiesis. Results Compared to EGFP titration, proviral DNA detection by qPCR was more accurate in assessing the number of infective particles in supernatants, such that average viral titres in terms of proviral copies per cell were two-fold higher. Transgene mRNA expression was directly determined from the vectors used without the need for reporter assays. A new parameter, defined here as the 'transcription index' (TI), served to establish the association between transcribed transgenic mRNA and each proviral insertion. The TI represents the potential expression of every vector or insertion in each cell type, and is thus useful as a control parameter for monitoring preclinical protocols. Conclusions The practical use of qPCR is demonstrated as a valuable alternative to reporter genes for the assessment and surveillance of insertion numbers and transgene expression. In combination with protein expression, this approach should be capable of establishing safer therapeutic gene doses, avoiding the potential side effects of high transduction and expression levels. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available