4.7 Article

Relation between grain growth and grain-boundary diffusion in a pure material by molecular dynamics simulations

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 54, Issue 15, Pages 4053-4061

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.05.004

Keywords

grain growth; grain-boundary migration; grain-boundary diffusion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traditionally, due to the impurities inevitably present in real materials that limit the grain-boundary (GB) mobility, the processes of grain growth and GB diffusion are thought to involve similar activation barriers. However, recent molecular dynamics (MID) simulations of GB migration in bicrystals have suggested that, in pure materials, GB diffusion and GB migration involve distinct mechanisms and, hence, different activation barriers. Here we report MID simulations of grain growth in an impurity-free model nanocrystalline palladium microstructure containing only high-energy GBs. By contrast with the bicrystal simulations, we observe virtually identical activation energies for grain growth and GB diffusion. We discuss several mechanisms that might be responsible for this difference between the bicrystal and polycrystal results, including accommodation of the curvature-driven GB migration by the elimination of GB area and GB excess free volume and a possible finite mobility of the triple junctions. The qualitative agreement of our observations with the general experimental findings is remarkable given the absence of any impurities in our model system. This suggests that a fundamental, intrinsic process may be responsible for the similar activation energies for GB migration and GB diffusion in polycrystals. In our model system this process seems to involve the accommodation of the curvature-driven GB migration by GB diffusion to eliminate the GB area and related GB free volume at the triple junctions. (c) 2006 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available