4.3 Article

State-independent block of BK channels by an intracellular quaternary ammonium

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 128, Issue 3, Pages 347-364

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1085/jgp.200609579

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intracellular blockade by quaternary ammonium ( QA) molecules of many potassium channels is state dependent, where the requirement for channel opening is evidenced by a time-dependent component of block in the macroscopic record. Whether this is the case for Ca2+- and voltage-activated potassium ( BK) channels, however, remains unclear. Previous work ( Li, W., and R. W. Aldrich. 2004. J. Gen. Physiol. 124: 43 - 57) tentatively proposed a state-dependent, trapping model, but left open the possibility of state-independent block. Here, we found BK channel blockade by a novel QA derivative, bbTBA, was time dependent, raising the possibility of state-dependent, open channel block. Alternatively, the observed voltage dependence of block could be sufficient to explain time-dependent block. We have used steady-state and kinetic measurements of bbTBA blockade in order to discriminate between these two possibilities. bbTBA did not significantly slow deactivation kinetics at potentials between - 200 and - 100 mV, suggesting that channels can close unhindered by bound bbTBA. We further find no evidence that bbTBA is trapped inside BK channels after closing. Measurements of steady state fractional block at + 40 mV revealed a 1.3-fold change in apparent affinity for a 33-fold change in P-o, in striking contrast to the 31-fold change predicted by state-dependent block. Finally, the appearance of a third kinetic component of bbTBA blockade at high concentrations is incompatible with state-dependent block. Our results suggest that access of intracellular bbTBA to the BK channel cavity is not strictly gated by channel opening and closing, and imply that the permeation gate for BK channels may not be intracellular.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available