4.3 Article

Impact of the CYP2D6 polymorphism on steady-state plasma concentrations and clinical outcome of donepezil in Alzheimer's disease patients

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 62, Issue 9, Pages 721-726

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-006-0168-1

Keywords

acetylcholinesterase inhibitors; Alzheimer's disease; CYP2D6; donepezil; polymorphism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The aims of this study were to evaluate the impact of the CYP2D6 polymorphism on both the steady-state plasma concentrations (Cp) and the clinical outcome of donepezil, a selective acetylcholinesterase inhibitor used in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods: Forty-two patients of Caucasian ethnicity affected by probable AD were included in the study. All had been receiving therapy with donepezil for at least 3 months: 31 patients with 5 mg/day and 11 patients with 10 mg/day. The CYP2D6 genotype was analysed, and donepezil Cp was measured by using high-performance liquid chromatography. Results: On the basis of their CYP2D6 genotype, 30 patients could be classified as homozygous extensive metabolizers (EM), 10 as heterozygous EM and 2 as ultrarapid metabolizers (UM). No poor metabolizer was found. The dose and body weight-corrected median donepezil Cp were slightly, though not significantly, lower in homozygous than in heterozygous EM (0.33 vs. 0.41 ng/ml/mg/kg, respectively). The latter group consistently showed a better clinical response to treatment, as measured by change in Mini-Mental State Examination score (median: 1.40 vs. -1.30, respectively). UM patients had lower Cp than EM patients and showed no clinical improvement. Conclusions: Our preliminary data suggest that the CYP2D6 polymorphism influences both donepezil metabolism and therapeutic outcome and that a knowledge of a patient's CYP2D6 genotype together with donepezil concentration measurements might be useful in the context of improving the clinical efficacy of donepezil therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available