4.6 Article

Candesartan, an angiotensin II type-1 receptor blocker, reduces cardiovascular events in patients on chronic haemodialysis - a randomized study

Journal

NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages 2507-2512

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfl293

Keywords

angiotensin receptor antagonists; brain natriuretic peptide; cardiovascular disease; cardiovascular mortality; congestive heart failure; randomized trail

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Cardiovascular events are the major determinants of the prognosis of patients on chronic haemodialysis. The present study was designed to investigate whether candesartan, an angiotensin II type-1 receptor blocker, reduces the incidence of cardiovascular events in these patients. Methods. A total of 80 chronic haemodialysis patients (male/female, 47/33; mean age +/- SEM, 61 +/- 1 years) in stable condition and with no clinical evidence of cardiac disorders were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned candesartan 4-8 mg/day (candesartan group; n = 43) or nothing (control group; n = 37), and followed for 19.4 +/- 1.2 months with as endpoint cardiovascular events such as fatal/nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, congestive heart failure, severe arrhythmia and sudden death. Results. Both groups exhibited similar clinical characteristics at baseline. During follow-up, cardiovascular events occurred in seven patients in the candesartan group and 17 in the control group. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that cardiovascular events and mortality rates were significantly (P < 0.01) higher in the control group than in the candesartan group (45.9 vs 16.3% and 18.9 vs 0.0%, respectively). Conclusions. Candesartan therapy significantly reduces cardiovascular events and mortality in patients on chronic maintenance haemodialysis and therefore improves the prognosis of these patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available