4.6 Article

Humoral immune response to flagellin requires T cells and activation of innate immunity

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 177, Issue 5, Pages 2810-2818

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.5.2810

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R-01 DK061417, DK64400, DK064399] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bacterial flagellin, the primary structural component of flagella, is a dominant target of humoral immunity upon infection by enteric pathogens and in Crohn's disease. To better understand how such responses may be regulated, we sought to define, in mice, basic mechanisms that regulate generation of flagellin-specific Igs. We observed that, in response to i.p. injection with flagellin, generation of flagellin-specific Ig required activation of innate immunity in that these responses were ablated in MyD88-deficient mice and that flagellin from Helicobacter pylori, which is known not to activate TLR5, also did not elicit Abs. Mice lacking alpha beta T cells (TCR beta(null)) were completely deficient in their ability to make flagellin Abs in various contexts indicating that, in contrast to common belief, generation of flagellin-specific Ig is absolutely T cell dependent. In contrast to Ab responses to whole flagella (H serotyping), responses to flagellin monomers displayed only moderate serospecificity. Whereas neither oral nor rectal administration of flagellin elicited a strong serum Ab response, induction of colitis with dextran sodium sulfate resulted in a MyD88-dependent serum Ab response to endogenous flagellin, suggesting that, in an inflammatory milieu, TLR signaling promotes acquisition of Abs to intestinal flagellin. Thus, acquisition of a humoral immune response to flagellin requires activation of innate immunity, is T cell dependent, and can originate from flagellin in the intestinal tract in inflammatory conditions in the intestine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available