4.7 Article

Prevention of rifampicin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii in an experimental pneumonia murine model, using rifampicin associated with imipenem or sulbactam

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
Volume 58, Issue 3, Pages 689-692

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkl303

Keywords

resistant mutant; combined treatment; in vivo resistance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To examine the development of rifampicin resistance in multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii exposed to rifampicin and the prevention of the appearance of rifampicin-resistant mutants when rifampicin is used in association with imipenem or sulbactam. Methods: A clinical strain of multidrug-resistant A. baumannii was used to examine the frequency of resistance to rifampicin in vivo, in a pneumonia model in immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice. The in vitro and in vivo prevention of the development of resistance to rifampicin was analysed using rifampicin alone or in association with imipenem or sulbactam, in time-kill studies and in the experimental murine pneumonia, respectively. Results: Rifampicin-resistant mutants were found at 48 and 72 h, both in vitro and in vivo, when rifampicin was used alone, with the MIC increasing from 4 to >= 128 mg/L. The in vivo frequency of rifampicin-resistant mutants was 3 x 10(-6). On the contrary, no resistant mutants appeared after 72 h, in vitro or in vivo, when rifampicin was employed in association with imipenem or sulbactam. After six daily passages in rifampicin-free agar plates the resistant mutants maintained the high resistance to rifampicin (>= 128 mg/L). Conclusions: These results suggest that rifampicin must not be used alone in the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant A. baumannii. In these cases, rifampicin may be used in combination with imipenem or sulbactam, which prevent the development of resistance to rifampicin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available