4.1 Article

Endoscopic palliation of cholangiocarcinoma

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages 551-560

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.mog.0000239872.12081.a4

Keywords

biliary tract neoplasms; cholangiocarcinoma; endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; magnetic resonance imaging; stents

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review The current endoscopic palliative modalities for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma are reviewed, focusing on the emergent methods of endoscopic palliation. Recent findings Cholangiocarcinoma is a rare malignant tumor arising from biliary epithelium. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography can provide histological diagnosis through brush cytology of the bile duct, and newer cytologic techniques such as digital image analysis and fluorescent in-situ hybridization may improve the cytologic accuracy for diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma. Endoscopic ultrasonography can play an adjunctive role in the diagnosis and staging by facilitating tissue acquisition through fine needle aspiration of the tumor and surrounding lymph nodes. Most patients present with unresectable disease and features of biliary obstruction. This has led to an emphasis on the role of palliative care. Biliary stent placement is an effective method of palliating obstructive jaundice. Newer modalities such as photodynamic therapy, intraluminal brachytherapy, and high-intensity ultrasound therapy may result in improved survival and play a future role as an adjunctive therapy to surgical resection. Summary Several endoscopic palliative modalities have recently emerged. Among these, photodynamic therapy in addition to biliary stent placement appears to be a promising step towards the management of locally unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. Randomized, controlled trials are required, however, to further evaluate these therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available