Dual ETA/ETB vs. selective ETA endothelin receptor antagonism in patients with pulmonary hypertension

Since the identification of endothelin as a key mediator in the pathogenesis of several diseases, including pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), the pharmacologic control of the activated endothelin system with endothelin receptor antagonists (ETRA) has been a major therapeutic achievement for the treatment of patients with PAH. To date, dual ETA/ETB and selective ETA receptor antagonists have clinically been evaluated. To answer die question of whether selective or dual ETRA is preferable in patients with PAH, experimental and clinical data with relevance to the pulmonary circulation are reviewed in this article. Whereas experimental and clinical data provide unambiguous evidence that ETA receptors mediate the detrimental effects of ET-1, such as vasoconstriction and cell proliferation, the elucidation of the role of ETB receptors has been more complex. It has been shown that there is a subpopulation of ETB receptors on smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts mediating vasoconstriction and proliferation. On the contrary, there is clear evidence that endothelial ETB receptors continue to mediate vasodilation, vasoprotection and ET-1 clearance despite the pathology associated with pulmonary hypertension. More difficult to assess is the net effect of these mechanisms in patients to be treated with ETRA.When considering the available data from controlled clinical trials, nonselectivity does not appear to carry a relevant clinical benefit for the treatment of patients with PAH when compared with selective ETA receptor antagonism.