4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Irradiation effects of swift heavy ions in actinide oxides and actinide nitrides: Structure and optical properties

Actinide oxides have been used as nuclear fuels in the majority of power reactors working in the world and actinide nitrides are under investigation for the fuels of the future fast neutron fission reactors developed in Forum Generation IV. Radiation damage in actinide oxides UO2, (U0.92Ce0.08)O-2, and actinide nitride UN has been characterized after irradiation with swift heavy ions. Fluences up to 3 x 10(13) ions/cm(2) of heavy ions (Kr 740 Mev, Cd 1 GeV) available at the CIRIL/GANIL facility were used to simulate irradiation in reactors by fission products and by neutrons. The macroscopic effects of irradiation remains very weak compared with those seen in other ceramic oxides irradiated in the same conditions: practically no swelling can be measured and no change in colour can be observed on the irradiated part of a polished face of sintered disks. The point defects in irradiated actinide compounds have been characterized by optical absorption spectroscopy in the LTV-Vis-NIR wavelength range. The absorption spectra before and after irradiation are compared, and unexpected stability of optical properties during irradiation is shown. This result confirms the low rate of formation of point defects in actinide oxides and actinide nitrides under irradiation. Actinide oxides and nitrides studied are > 40% ionic, and oxidation state of the actinides seems to be stable during irradiation. The small amount of point defects produced by radiation (< 10(16) cm) has been identified from differences between the absorption spectrum before irradiation and the one after irradiation: point defects in oxygen or nitrogen lattices can be observed respectively in oxides and nitrides (F centres), and small amounts of U5+ would be present in all compounds. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available