4.8 Article

Specific temporal profile of matrix metalloproteinase release occurs in patients after myocardial infarction - Relation to left ventricular remodeling

Journal

CIRCULATION
Volume 114, Issue 10, Pages 1020-1027

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.600353

Keywords

extracellular matrix; matrix metalloproteinases; myocardial infarction; remodeling

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [MO1-RR-01070-251] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01-HL-48788, R01-HL-59165] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background - Changes in matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) and tissue inhibitors of MMPs (TIMPs) contribute to left ventricular (LV) remodeling after myocardial infarction (MI). We tested the hypothesis that a specific plasma MMP/TIMP profile would emerge after MI and be associated with the degree of LV dilation. Methods and Results - LV end-diastolic volume and MMP/TIMP plasma profiles were determined in 53 age-matched control subjects and 32 post-MI patients from day 1 through 180 after MI. LV end-diastolic volume increased by > 38% at day 90 after MI (P < 0.05). MMP-9 increased by > 150% from control at day 1 after MI (P < 0.05) and remained elevated. MMP-8 rose to > 120% at day 3 after MI (P < 0.05) and fell to control values by day 5. TIMP-1 increased by > 60% from control at day 1 after MI (P < 0.05), whereas TIMP-2 increased only at later time points. Cardiac-specific TIMP-4 fell by 40% at day 5 after MI and remained reduced. A persistent or elevated MMP-9 at day 5 was accompanied by a 3-fold end-diastolic volume increase at day 28 (P < 0.05). Conclusions - A specific temporal pattern of MMP/TIMPs occurred in post-MI patients that included an early and robust rise in MMP-9 and MMP-8 and a uniform fall in TIMP-4. These findings suggest that a specific MMP/ TIMP plasma profile occurs after MI and holds both prognostic and diagnostic significance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available