4.7 Article

Sugar fragmentation in the Maillard reaction cascade:: Isotope labeling studies on the formation of acetic acid by a hydrolytic β-dicarbonyl cleavage mechanism

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 54, Issue 18, Pages 6667-6676

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf060667q

Keywords

Maillard reaction; acetic acid; 1-deoxy-2,3-hexodiulose; hydrolytic beta-dicarbonyl cleavage; labeling studies; sugar fragmentation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The formation of acetic acid was elucidated based on volatile reaction products and related nonvolatile key intermediates. The origin and yield of acetic acid were determined under well-controlled conditions (90-120 degrees C, pH 6-8). Experiments with various (13)C-labeled glucose isotopomers in the presence of glycine revealed all six carbon atoms being incorporated into acetic acid: C-1/C-2 (similar to 70%), C-3/C-4 (similar to 10%), and C-5/C-6 (similar to 20%). Acetic acid is a good marker of the 2,3-enolization pathway since it is almost exclusively formed from 1-deoxy- 2,3-diulose intermediates. Depending on the pH, the acetic acid conversion yield reached 85 mol % when using 1-deoxy- 2,3-hexodiulose (1) as a precursor. Hydrolytic beta-dicarbonyl cleavage of 1-deoxy-2,4-hexodiuloses was shown to be the major pathway leading to acetic acid from glucose without the intermediacy of any oxidizing agents. The presence of key intermediates was corroborated for the first time, i.e., tetroses and 2-hydroxy-3-oxobutanal, a tautomer of 1-hydroxy-2,3-butanedione, also referred to as 1-deoxy-2,3-tetrodiulose. The hydrolytic,-dicarbonyl cleavage represents a general pathway to organic acids, which corresponds to an acyloin cleavage or a retro-Claisen type reaction. Although alternative mechanisms must exist, the frequently reported hydrolytic alpha-dicarbonyl cleavage of 1 can be ruled out as a pathway forming carboxylic acids.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available