4.6 Article

Superoxide fluxes limit nitric oxide-induced signaling

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 281, Issue 36, Pages 25984-25993

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M602242200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Independently, superoxide (O-2(-)) and nitric oxide (NO) are biologically important signaling molecules. When co-generated, these radicals react rapidly to form powerful oxidizing and nitrating intermediates. Although this reaction was once thought to be solely cytotoxic, herein we demonstrate using MCF7, macrophage, and endothelial cells that when nanomolar levels of NO and O-2(-) were produced concomitantly, the effective NO concentration was established by the relative fluxes of these two radicals. Differential regulation of sGC, pERK, HIF-1 alpha, and p53 were used as biological dosimeters for NO concentration. Introduction of intracellular-or extracellular-generated O-2-during NO generation resulted in a concomitant increase in oxidative intermediates with a decrease in steady-state NO concentrations and a proportional reduction in the levels of sGC, ERK, HIF-1 alpha, and p53 regulation. NO responses were restored by addition of SOD. The intermediates formed from the reactions of NO with O-2(-) were non-toxic, did not form 3-nitrotyrosine, nor did they elicit any signal transduction responses. H2O2 in bolus or generated from the dismutation of O-2-by SOD, was cytotoxic at high concentrations and activated p53 independent of NO. This effect was completely inhibited by catalase, suppressed by NO, and exacerbated by intracellular catalase inhibition. We conclude that the reaction of O-2(-) with NO is an important regulatory mechanism, which modulates signaling pathways by limiting steady-state levels of NO and preventing H2O2 formation from O-2(-).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available