4.6 Article

Hydrodynamic-based delivery of an interleukin-22-Ig fusion gene ameliorates experimental autoimmune myocarditis in rats

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 177, Issue 6, Pages 3635-3643

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.6.3635

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

IL-22 is one of several cytokines with limited homology to IL-10. However, the biological activities of IL-22 are mostly unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of IL-22 on rat experimental autoimmune myocarditis (EAM) and elucidate an aspect of the biological activities of IL-22. Rats were immunized on day 0; IL-22-Ig-treated rats were injected with pCAGGS-IL-22-Ig and control rats with pCAGGS-Ig using hydrodynamics-based gene delivery on day 1 or day 6. IL-22-Ig gene therapy administered on day 1 or day 6 after immunization was effective in controlling EAM as monitored by the heart weight to body weight ratio, and the myocarditis area in rats was sacrificed on day 17. Examination of the expression of IL-22-related genes in purified cells from EAM hearts suggested that IL-22-Ig acting target cells were noncardiomyocytic (NC) noninflammatory cells such as fibroblasts, smooth muscle cells, and endothelial cells. Therefore, we examined the effect of rIL-22 or serum containing IL-22-Ig on the expression of immune-relevant genes in IL-1-stimulated NC cells cultured from EAM hearts. Results showed that the expression of immunologic molecules (PGE synthase, cyclooxygenase-2, MIP-2, MCP-1, IL-6, and cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant-2) in IL-1-stimulated NC cells was significantly decreased by rIL-22 or serum containing IL-22-Ig. EAM was suppressed by hydrodynamic-based delivery of plasmid DNA encoding IL-22-Ig, and the reason for this effectiveness may be that IL-22 suppressed gene expression of PG synthases, IL-6, and chemokines in activated NC noninflammatory cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available