4.6 Article

Ambient air pollution and asthma exacerbations in children: An eight-city analysis

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 164, Issue 6, Pages 505-517

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwj225

Keywords

air pollution; asthma; carbon monoxide; nitrogen dioxide; ozone; pediatrics; sulfur dioxide

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [N01-HR-16050, N01-HR-16049, N01-HR-16047, N01-HR-16051, N01-HR-16044, N01-HR-16045, N01-HR-16046, N01-HR-16052, N01-HR-16048] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The authors investigated the relation between ambient concentrations of five of the Environmental Protection Agency's criteria pollutants and asthma exacerbations (daily symptoms and use of rescue inhalers) among 990 children in eight North American cities during the 22-month prerandomization phase (November 1993-September 1995) of the Childhood Asthma Management Program. Short-term effects of carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter less than 10 mu m in aerodynamic diameter (PM10), sulfur dioxide, and warm-season ozone were examined in both one-pollutant and two-pollutant models, using lags of up to 2 days. Lags in carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide were positively associated with both measures of asthma exacerbation, and the 3-day moving sum of sulfur dioxide levels was marginally related to asthma symptoms. PM10 and ozone were unrelated to exacerbations. The strongest effects tended to be seen with 2-day lags, where a 1-parts-per-million change in carbon monoxide and a 20-parts-per-billion change in nitrogen dioxide were associated with symptom odds ratios of 1.08 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02, 1.15) and 1.09 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.15), respectively, and with rate ratios for rescue inhaler use of 1.06 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.10) and 1.05 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.09), respectively. The authors believe that the observed carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide associations can probably be attributed to mobile-source emissions, though more research is required.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available