4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Heart rate response during exercise predicts survival in adults with congenital heart disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 6, Pages 1250-1256

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.051

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES To assess the prognostic value of heart rate response to exercise in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients. BACKGROUND An abnormal heart rate response to exercise is related to autonomic dysfunction and may have prognostic implications in ACHD. METHODS We identified 727 consecutive ACHD patients (mean age [+/- SD] 33 +/- 13 years) with varying diagnoses and without pacemakers. Peak oxygen consumption (peak Vo(2)), resting heart rate, and the increase in heart rate from resting level to peak exercise (heart rate reserve) were measured. We also quantified the decrease in heart rate (heart rate recovery) after cessation of exercise. RESULTS During a median follow-up of 28 months, 38 patients died. Lower values of heart rate reserve, peak heart rate, heart rate recovery, and peak Vo(2) (p < 0.01 for each) were associated with increased mortality in univariate analysis. Furthermore, heart rate reserve predicted mortality independently of antiarrhythmic therapy, functional class, and peak Vo(2) Stratifying patients by diagnostic groups revealed that a lower heart rate reserve was also associated with a greater risk of death in patients with complex anatomy, Fortran circulation, and tetralogy of Fallot (p < 0.05 for each). CONCLUSIONS An abnormal heart rate response to exercise identifies ACHD patients with a higher risk of mortality in the midterm, even after accounting for antiarrhythmic medication and exercise capacity. Heart rate reserve is a simple and inexpensive way to identify ACHD patients at higher mortality risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available