4.4 Article

Rising incidence of small renal masses: A need to reassess treatment effect

Journal

JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE
Volume 98, Issue 18, Pages 1331-1334

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djj362

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [T-32-DK007758] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The incidence of kidney cancer has been rising over the last two decades, especially in cases where the disease is localized. Although rates of renal surgery parallel this trend, mortality rates have continued to rise. To investigate the basis of this treatment disconnect (i.e., increased rates of treatment accompanied by increased mortality rates), we analyzed patient data from nine registries of the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. We assembled a cohort of 34503 kidney cancer patients and derived incidence, treatment, and mortality trends for kidney cancer, overall and as a function of tumor size. From 1983 to 2002, the overall age-adjusted incidence rate for kidney cancer rose from 7.1 to 10.8 cases per 100000 US population; tumors <= 4 cm in size accounted for most of the increase. Adjusted rates of renal surgery increased concurrently, most notably for tumors <= 4 cm (0.9-3.6 surgeries per 100000 US population). However, among kidney cancer patients, all-cause mortality per 100000 US population increased from 1.5 deaths in 1983 to 6.5 deaths in 2002, with the greatest absolute increase noted for patients with lesions > 7 cm. Our results demonstrate that the rising incidence of kidney cancer is largely attributable to an increase in small renal masses that are presumably curable. The fact that increased detection and treatment of small tumors is not reducing mortality argues for a reassessment of the current treatment paradigm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available