4.0 Article

Onychomycosis in Children: An Experience of 59 Cases

Journal

ANNALS OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 327-334

Publisher

KOREAN DERMATOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.5021/ad.2013.25.3.327

Keywords

Child; Onychomycosis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Although tinea unguium in children has been studied in the past, no specific etiological agents of onychomycosis in children has been reported in Korea. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate onychomycosis in Korean children. Methods: We reviewed fifty nine patients with onychomycosis in children (0 similar to 18 years of age) who presented during the ten-year period between 1999 and 2009. Etiological agents were identified by cultures on Sabouraud's dextrose agar with and without cycloheximide. An isolated colony of yeasts was considered as pathogens if the same fungal element was identified at initial direct microscopy and in specimen-yielding cultures at a follow-up visit. Results: Onychomycosis in children represented 2.3% of all onychomycosis. Of the 59 pediatric patients with onychomycosis, 66.1% had toenail onychomycosis with the rest (33.9%) having fingernail onychomycosis. The male-to-female ratio was 1.95:1. Fourteen (23.7%) children had concomitant tinea pedis infection, and tinea pedis or onychomycosis was also found in eight of the parents (13.6%). Distal and lateral subungual onychomycosis was the most common (62.7%) clinical type. In toenails, Trichophyton rubrum was the most common etiological agent (51.3%), followed by Candida albicans (10.2%), C. parapsilosis (5.1%), C. tropicalis (2.6%), and C. guilliermondii (2.6%). In fingernails, C. albicans was the most common isolated pathogen (50.0%), followed by T. rubrum (10.0%), C. parapsilosis (10.0%), and C. glabrata (5.0%). Conclusion: Because of the increase in pediatric onychomycosis, we suggest the need for a careful mycological examination of children who are diagnosed with onychomycosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available