4.6 Article

Dissociation between tumor shrinkage and hormonal response during somatostatin analog treatment in an acromegalic patient: Preferential expression of somatostatin receptor subtype 3

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 29, Issue 9, Pages 826-830

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/BF03347378

Keywords

acromegaly; GH; somatotrophic adenoma; SS analog; SS receptor subtypes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: About a third of acromegalic patients is resistant to available SS analogs (SA), octreotide (OCT) and lanreotide (LAN). Such resistance is related to reduction of SS receptor (SSTR) density or to a different expression of SSTR subtypes. There are 5 known SSTR subtypes. SSTR2 and SSTR5 are usually expressed in GH-secreting pituitary tumors, and both SA bind preferentially to SSTR2 and, to a lesser extent, to SSTR5. We herein describe an acromegalic patient who presented impressive tumor shrinkage without hormonal normalization during primary therapy with SA. Material and Methods: This 23-yr-old male acromegalic patient was treated with slow-release LAN (LAN-SR), 30 mg every 10 days for six months, followed by OCT-LAR, 30 mg every 28 days for an additional six months with a 75% tumor volume reduction but without GH and IGF-I normalization. Subsequently, he underwent pituitary surgery and expression of SSTR in the removed tumor was performed by real time RT-PCR by the 2-(Delta Ct) method, using GAPDH as internal control. All PCR products were confirmed by automated sequencing. Results: SSTR expression revealed an unusual profile, with almost exclusively expression of SSTR3. Conclusions: These unusual clinical and receptor subtypes profile suggest an important role of SSTR3 on tumor shrinkage. The low affinity of LAN and OCT for this SSTR subtype could be compensated by its high expression in this GH-secreting pituitary macroadenoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available