Journal
NATURE METHODS
Volume 3, Issue 10, Pages 777-779Publisher
NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth1006-777
Keywords
-
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Large-scale RNA interference (RNAi)-based analyses, very much as other 'omic' approaches, have inherent rates of false positives and negatives. The variability in the standards of care applied to validate results from these studies, if left unchecked, could eventually begin to undermine the credibility of RNAi as a powerful functional approach. This Commentary is an invitation to an open discussion started among various users of RNAi to set forth accepted standards that would insure the quality and accuracy of information in the large datasets coming out of genome-scale screens.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available