4.7 Article

Magnetic resonance imaging captures the biology of ductal carcinoma in situ

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 28, Pages 4603-4610

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.5518

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA069587, R01 CA116182] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important tool for characterizing invasive breast cancer but has proven to be more challenging in the setting of ductal carcinoma in situ (DICIS). We investigated whether MRI features of DCIS reflect differences in biology and pathology. Patients and Methods Forty five of 100 patients with biopsy-proven DCIS who underwent MRI and had sufficient tissue to be characterized by pathologic (nuclear grade, presence of comedo necrosis, size, and density of disease) and immunohistochemical (IHC) findings (proliferation, Ki67; angiogenesis, CD34; and inflammation, CD68). Pathology and MRI features (enhancement patterns, distribution, size, and density) were analyzed using pairwise and canonical correlations. Results Histopathologic and IHC variables correlated with MRI features (r = 0.73). The correlation was largely due to size, density (by either MRI or pathology), and inflammation (P <.05). Most small focal masses were estrogen receptor-positive. MRI enhancement patterns that were clumped were more likely than heterogeneous patterns to be high-grade lesions. Homogenous lesions were large, high grade, and rich in macrophages. Presence of comedo necrosis and size could be distinguished on MRI (P <.05). MRI was most likely to over-represent the size of less dense, diffuse DICIS lesions. Conclusion The heterogeneous presentation of DCIS on MRI reflects underlying histopathologic differences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available