4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Decision fusion for the classification of urban remote sensing images

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING
Volume 44, Issue 10, Pages 2828-2838

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2006.876708

Keywords

classification; data fusion; decision fusion; fuzzy logic; fuzzy set theory; remote sensing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The classification of very high resolution remote sensing images from urban areas is addressed by considering the fusion of multiple classifiers which provide redundant or complementary results. The proposed fusion approach is in two steps. In a first step, data are processed by each classifier separately, and the algorithms provide for each pixel membership degrees for the considered classes. Then, in a second step, a fuzzy decision rule is used to aggregate the results provided by the algorithms according to the classifiers' capabilities. In this paper, a general framework for combining information from several individual classifiers in multiclass classification is. proposed. It is based on the definition of two measures of accuracy. The first one is a pointwise measure which estimates for each pixel the reliability of the information provided by each classifier. By modeling the output of a classifier as a fuzzy set, this pointwise reliability is defined as the degree of uncertainty of the fuzzy set. The second measure estimates the global accuracy of each classifier. It is defined a priori by the, user. Finally, the results are aggregated with an adaptive fuzzy operator ruled by these two accuracy measures. The method is tested and validated with two classifiers on IKONOS images from urban areas. The proposed method improves the classification results when compared with the separate use of the different classifiers. The approach is also compared with several other fuzzy fusion schemes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available