4.6 Article

The impact of dehydration rate on the production and cellular location of reactive oxygen species in an aquatic moss

Journal

ANNALS OF BOTANY
Volume 110, Issue 5, Pages 1007-1016

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcs180

Keywords

Cell survival; confocal microscopy; dehydration rate; desiccation; diaminobenzidine; dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate; Fontinalis antipyretica; oxygen consumption; reactive oxygen species; ROS

Categories

Funding

  1. Portugal by Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT) [SFRH/BD/31424/2006]
  2. FEDER POCI, Lisbon [POCI/AMB/63160/2004, PPCDT/AMB/63160/2004]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [CGL2009-13429-C02-01/02]
  4. AECID [PCI_A_l024755/09]
  5. Generalitat Valenciana [PROMETEO 174/2008 GVA]
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [POCI/AMB/63160/2004, SFRH/BD/31424/2006] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aquatic moss Fontinalis antipyretica requires a slow rate of dehydration to survive a desiccation event. The present work examined whether differences in the dehydration rate resulted in corresponding differences in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and therefore in the amount of cell damage. Intracellular ROS production by the aquatic moss was assessed with confocal laser microscopy and the ROS-specific chemical probe 2,7-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate. The production of hydrogen peroxide was also quantified and its cellular location was assessed. The rehydration of slowly dried cells was associated with lower ROS production, thereby reducing the amount of cellular damage and increasing cell survival. A high oxygen consumption burst accompanied the initial stages of rehydration, perhaps due to the burst of ROS production. A slow dehydration rate may induce cell protection mechanisms that serve to limit ROS production and reduce the oxidative burst, decreasing the number of damaged and dead cells due upon rehydration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available