4.5 Article

Cyclic fatigue resistance and three-dimensional analysis of instruments from two nickel-titanium rotary systems

Journal

INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
Volume 39, Issue 10, Pages 755-763

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01143.x

Keywords

3D microcomputerized tomography; 3D volumetric analysis; cyclic fatigue testing; Ni-Ti rotary instruments

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim To determine how instrument design affects the fatigue life of two nickel-titanium (Ni-Ti) rotary systems (Mtwo and ProTaper) under cyclic fatigue stress in simulated root canals. Methodology Cyclic fatigue testing of instruments was performed in stainless steel artificial canals with radii of curvature of 2 or 5 mm and an angle of curvature of 60 degrees. A total of 260 instruments were rotated until fracture occurred and the number of cycles to failure were recorded. The morphology of Ni-Ti rotary instruments was investigated by measuring the volume of millimetre slices of each instrument size starting from the tip to the shank by means of mu CT analysis. The fracture surface of three representative samples of each size was analysed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were analysed by one-way ANOVA, Holm t-test, paired t-test and linear regression; the significance was determined at the 95% confidence level. Results Cycles to failure significantly decreased as the instrument volume increased for both the radii of curvature tested (P < 0.01). The radius of curvature had a statistically significant influence on the fatigue life of the instruments (P < 0.05). Larger instruments underwent fracture in less time under cyclic stress than smaller ones. SEM evaluation showed typical features of fracture through fatigue failure. Conclusions The metal volume in the point of maximum stress during a cyclic fatigue test could affect the fatigue life of Ni-Ti rotary instruments. The larger the metal volume, the lower the fatigue resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available