4.6 Article

Non-destructive estimation of root pressure using sap flow, stem diameter measurements and mechanistic modelling

Journal

ANNALS OF BOTANY
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages 271-282

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcs249

Keywords

Root pressure; stem diameter; diameter change; tomato; sap flow; Solanum lycopersicum; mechanistic model; cohesiontension; water relations

Categories

Funding

  1. Ghent University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Upward water movement in plants via the xylem is generally attributed to the cohesiontension theory, as a response to transpiration. Under certain environmental conditions, root pressure can also contribute to upward xylem water flow. Although the occurrence of root pressure is widely recognized, ambiguity exists about the exact mechanism behind root pressure, the main influencing factors and the consequences of root pressure. In horticultural crops, such as tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), root pressure is thought to cause cells to burst, and to have an important impact on the marketable yield. Despite the challenges of root pressure research, progress in this area is limited, probably because of difficulties with direct measurement of root pressure, prompting the need for indirect and non-destructive measurement techniques. A new approach to allow non-destructive and non-invasive estimation of root pressure is presented, using continuous measurements of sap flow and stem diameter variation in tomato combined with a mechanistic flow and storage model, based on cohesiontension principles. Transpiration-driven sap flow rates are typically inversely related to stem diameter changes; however, this inverse relationship was no longer valid under conditions of low transpiration. This decoupling between sap flow rates and stem diameter variations was mathematically related to root pressure. Root pressure can be estimated in a non-destructive, repeatable manner, using only external plant sensors and a mechanistic model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available