4.5 Review

Interactions between corticosteroids and β2-agonists

Journal

CLINICAL REVIEWS IN ALLERGY & IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 2-3, Pages 231-245

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1385/CRIAI:31:2:231

Keywords

beta-agonist; corticosteroid; interaction; synergy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In vitro studies have demonstrated numerous ways in which beta(2)-agonists and corticosteroids may interact. Together with evidence of improved control of airway diseases using a combination therapy of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-agonists compared with treatment with either drug alone, this suggests that there may be a beneficial synergy between these two classes of medication. However, a positive interaction has not been clearly demonstrated in vivo. There is little evidence that beta(2)-agonists enhance the anti-inflammatory actions of inhaled corticosteroids. Corticosteroids do not enhance the bronchodilator response to beta(2)-agonists, nor do they appear to prevent the development of tolerance during chronic beta(2)-agonist treatment. The evidence that high doses of corticosteroids can reverse tolerance to beta(2)-agonists is conflicting. Most of the clinical benefits from combinations using inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-agonists to treat asthma could result from additive or complimentary effects of the drugs on different parts of the disease process. Nevertheless, there are several studies in which the combination of a long- or short-acting beta-agonist with an inhaled corticosteroid appears to have provided more than additive clinical benefits. The issue warrants further study. Combined inhaled corticosteroid / beta-agonist treatment will remain the basis of asthma management for the forseeable future, and although the overall clinical benefit of the combination is no longer in doubt, there is more to learn about maximizing this benefit and minimizing adverse effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available