4.6 Article

Sleep-disordered breathing after stroke: a randomised controlled trial of continuous positive airway pressure

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY
Volume 77, Issue 10, Pages 1143-1149

Publisher

B M J PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.086686

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is common after stroke, but it is unclear whether it should be treated. Objective: To conduct a randomised controlled trial of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) after stroke. Methods: Patients with stroke with >= 30 apnoeas and hypopnoeas per hour ((A+H)/h) with predominant obstructive sleep apnoea or hypopnoea were randomised to either CPAP treatment or conservative treatment for 8 weeks. Outcomes were measured blind to treatment allocation at 8 weeks and 6 months after the stroke. The primary outcome was physical function on the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale. Results: Of 658 patients with stroke screened, only 71 ( 10.7%) were eligible and consented to a sleep study 14 - 19 days after stroke. 66 patients completed the sleep study ( 21 women; mean age 72 years), 33 (50%) had >= 30 (A+H)/h that were predominantly obstructive. 15 were randomised to CPAP treatment and 15 to conventional treatment. Despite intensive efforts, objective use of CPAP was poor, averaging 1.4 h a night. CPAP treatment resulted in no significant improvements (p > 0.1) in the primary outcome or in neurological function or sleepiness, and in poorer health status on some measures. Conclusions: This trial showed no benefit from CPAP treatment, the relevance of the observed detrimental effects is questionable. Even in our highly selected patients with stroke, use of CPAP was poor. At present, CPAP treatment should be advocated for patients with stroke only if they have symptoms of SDB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available