4.6 Article

Synorganisation without organ fusion in the flowers of Geranium robertianum (Geraniaceae) and its not so trivial obdiplostemony

Journal

ANNALS OF BOTANY
Volume 106, Issue 5, Pages 687-695

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcq171

Keywords

Angiosperms; diplostemony; floral architecture; floral development; floral morphology; fusion; Geraniaceae; Geranium robertianum; obdiplostemony; synorganisation

Categories

Funding

  1. Urs Jauch, Institute of Plant Biology at the University of Zurich
  2. Klaus Marquardt, Center for Microscopy and Image Analysis at the University of Zurich

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Synorganisation of floral organs, an important means in angiosperm flower evolution, is mostly realized by congenital or post-genital organ fusion. Intimate synorganisation of many floral organs without fusion, as present in Geranium robertianum, is poorly known and needs to be studied. Obdiplostemony, the seemingly reversed position of two stamen whorls, widely distributed in core eudicots, has been the subject of much attention, but there is confusion in the literature. Obdiplostemony occurs in Geranium and whether and how it is involved in this synorganisation is explored here. Floral development and architecture were studied with light microscopy based on microtome section series and with scanning electron microscopy. Intimate synorganisation of floral organs is effected by the formation of five separate nectar canals for the proboscis of pollinators. Each nectar canal is formed by six adjacent organs from four organ whorls. In addition, the sepals are hooked together by the formation of longitudinal ribs and grooves, and provide a firm scaffold for the canals. Obdiplostemony provides a guide rail within each canal formed by the flanks of the antepetalous stamen filaments. Intimate synorganisation in flowers can be realized without any fusion, and obdiplostemony may play a role in this synorganisation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available