4.7 Article

Indoor and outdoor levels of respirable particulates (PM10) and Carbon Monoxide (CO) in high-rise apartment buildings

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
Volume 40, Issue 32, Pages 6067-6076

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.05.037

Keywords

apartment floor; atmospheric stability; proximity; roadway; exposure level

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present study evaluated exposure to two mobile source-related pollutants (CO and PM10) in high-rise apartment buildings, according to floor height. The outdoor air concentrations of CO and PM10 were higher for the lower-floor apartments than for the higher-floor apartments, and they were significantly higher in the winter and summer. However, the difference of indoor concentrations between the lower-floor and higher-floor apartments depended upon the season. Most indoor and outdoor concentrations of PM10 were significantly higher in apartments, which were in close proximity to a major roadway, as compared to those further away, whereas the indoor and outdoor concentrations of CO did not vary much according to distances from major roadways. Atmospheric stability was important regarding the level of exposure to both CO and PM10 for residents of high-rise apartment buildings. These parameters (apartment floor, proximity to roadways, season, and atmospheric stability) should be considered when evaluating the level of exposure to CO and PM10 for residents living in high-rise apartment buildings. The median PM10 outdoor concentrations were close to or lower than the Korean annual standard for PM10 (70 mu g m(-3)) or the American annual standard (50 mu g m(-3)). Neither the median nor the maximum outdoor CO concentrations were higher than the Korean 8-h CO standard (9 ppm). However, the maximum PM10 concentrations substantially exceeded the Korean standard, thus suggesting the need for a management strategy regarding episodic ambient PM10 pollution. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available