4.0 Article

Personality and major depression - A Swedish longitudinal, population-based twin study

Journal

ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 63, Issue 10, Pages 1113-1120

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.10.1113

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context: Prior studies suggest that the personality traits of neuroticism and extroversion may be related to the liability to major depression ( MD). Objective: To clarify the magnitude and nature of the association between neuroticism and extroversion and the risk for MD. Design: Longitudinal population-based twin cohort. Setting: General community. Participants: A total of 20 692 members of same-sex twin pairs from the population-based Swedish Twin Registry who completed a self-report questionnaire assessing neuroticism and extroversion in 1972 and 1973 and were personally interviewed for lifetime history of MD more than 25 years later. Main Outcome Measure: Lifetime history of modified DSM-IV MD. Results: Levels of neuroticism strongly predicted the risks for both lifetime and new-onset MD. Twin modeling indicated that the association between neuroticism and MD resulted largely from shared genetic risk factors, with a genetic correlation of +0.46 to +0.47. Levels of extroversion were weakly and inversely related to the risks for lifetime and new-onset MD. This effect disappeared when we controlled for the level of neuroticism. Twin modeling produced similar results. Conclusions: Results from both longitudinal and genetic analyses support the hypothesis that neuroticism strongly reflects the liability to MD. This association arises largely because neuroticism indexes the genetic risk for depressive illness. However, substantial proportions of the genetic vulnerability to MD are not reflected in neuroticism. By contrast, extroversion is only weakly related to risk for MD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available